Diffuse reactive shedding — diagnosing, reassuring, and resolving
Overview
Mechanism
Triggers
Clinical Features
Diagnosis
Chronic TE
Management
Quick Recall
Anki Cards
References
GP-Level Analogy
"Telogen effluvium is the hair equivalent of a factory shutdown. A major crisis — illness, surgery, crash diet, childbirth — signals the factory to suspend production and send all the workers home at once. Three months later, when those workers' contracts all expire at the same moment, the factory floor empties. The hair loss patients notice at month three was decided at month zero — and the factory is already re-opening."
Telogen effluvium (TE) is the most common cause of acute diffuse hair loss and one of the most frequently mismanaged presentations in general practice. It is characterised by excessive shedding of telogen (resting phase) club hairs, typically occurring 2–4 months after a triggering event.
TE is self-limiting in the acute form and requires no specific pharmacological treatment beyond identifying and correcting the underlying trigger. The GP's role is to diagnose accurately, identify the cause, correct reversible contributors, and provide reassurance — preventing the additional psychological distress of misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment.
Key epidemiological facts
Prevalence
Most common acute shedding
Most frequent cause of acute diffuse hair loss. Affects women more than men due to higher prevalence of triggers (pregnancy, iron deficiency, thyroid disease).
Timeline
2–4 month lag
Trigger occurs at month 0. Shedding peaks at 2–4 months. Spontaneous recovery typically by 6–12 months after trigger removal.
Prognosis
Excellent if trigger removed
Acute TE: near-complete recovery in 95% of cases once the trigger is removed. Chronic TE (>6 months): requires thorough investigation and may be persistent.
Mechanism of telogen effluvium
TE occurs when a systemic stressor causes a synchronised, premature shift of anagen follicles into telogen. This results in a cohort of follicles all reaching the end of their telogen phase simultaneously — producing a wave of shedding 2–4 months later.
Fig 7.1 — Timeline of telogen effluvium from trigger to recovery
Fig 7.1: TE timeline from trigger to recovery. The critical teaching point: when the patient presents with distressing shedding (month 2–4), the trigger happened 2–4 months earlier and the body has often already begun correcting itself. Regrowth begins before shedding even stops.
Kligman's five types of telogen effluvium
Kligman (1961) described five pathophysiological mechanisms producing TE. Understanding them helps identify the cause and predict the course.
Type
Mechanism
Clinical example
Immediate anagen release
Sudden premature termination of anagen → rapid telogen entry
High fever, acute severe illness, crash dieting
Delayed anagen release
Prolonged anagen (e.g. pregnancy) followed by synchronised release
Early exogen — premature shedding of normal telogen hairs
Stopping minoxidil
Delayed telogen release
Prolonged telogen → delayed mass shedding in spring/summer
Seasonal shedding (physiological, minor)
GP Analogy — The 3-month rule
"When a patient tells you their hair started falling out in October, ask what happened in June. Telogen effluvium always points backwards in time. The crime was committed 2–4 months before the body reports it."
Triggers — the CHIPS framework
The most common triggers can be remembered with the CHIPS mnemonic. Always ask about events 2–4 months before the onset of shedding.
COVID-19, influenza, malaria, sepsis. Any systemic illness with fever >38.5°C.
I
Iron / Nutritional
Iron deficiency (most common correctable cause in women). Rapid weight loss, crash dieting, protein malnutrition, post-bariatric surgery.
P
Psychological / Physical stress
Major surgery, trauma, bereavement, job loss, relationship breakdown. CRH receptors on follicle mediate stress response.
Plus S — Systemic disease: thyroid disease (most important — both hypo and hyper), SLE, inflammatory bowel disease, renal disease, hepatic disease, malignancy.
Fig 7.2 — Common triggers mapped to onset timing
Fig 7.2: Common TE triggers grouped by category. Always ask about the 2–4 month lookback window. COVID-19 has become one of the most common triggers since 2020, with TE reported in 25–33% of patients post-infection.
Drugs causing telogen effluvium
Drug class
Examples
Mechanism
Anticoagulants
Warfarin, heparin, DOACs
Telogen induction — unknown exact mechanism
Retinoids
Isotretinoin, acitretin
Dose-dependent anagen arrest → TE at 2–3 months
Beta-blockers
Propranolol, atenolol, metoprolol
Unknown — possibly through catecholamine suppression
TE has a characteristic clinical presentation that allows confident diagnosis in most cases. The combination of diffuse shedding, normal scalp, positive pull test, and a relevant preceding trigger is pathognomonic.
Fig 7.3 — Clinical examination findings in acute TE
Fig 7.3: Clinical examination in acute TE. Diffuse thinning across ALL zones including the occipital scalp (unlike AGA where occipital zone is spared) with shed hairs showing white club bulbs. The scalp surface is entirely normal.
What the shed hair looks like
Telogen hair (TE)
Club bulb — white/pigmented root
A rounded, club-shaped, pale or pigmented bulb at the proximal end. The bulb is fully keratinised — no root sheath. This is normal telogen hair shed at exogen. Normal: up to 100/day. TE: 200–400+/day.
Anagen hair (effluvium)
Tapered, fleshy anagen bulb
A tapered, gel-covered, fleshy root sheath still attached. Indicates anagen effluvium (chemotherapy, radiation) — a different and more serious mechanism. Not typical of TE.
Patient-reported symptoms
Symptom
Typical in TE
Notes
Hair on pillow, in shower drain
Yes — alarming quantity
Patients often count — 200–400/day common in acute TE
Scalp symptoms (itch, pain, scale)
Absent in uncomplicated TE
Symptoms suggest co-morbidity (sebderm, psoriasis) or alternative diagnosis
Diffuse scalp thinning visible
Moderate — visible when >25% density lost
Less visible than AGA — uniform reduction rather than patterned
Ponytail thickness reduced
Yes — objective measure
Useful patient-reported objective marker; elastic band circumference
Anxiety about hair loss
Very common — often driving the consultation
Patients frequently convinced they will become bald — reassurance is key treatment
Diagnosis and investigation
Diagnostic criteria
Acute TE diagnosis: Diffuse shedding + club bulbs on shed hairs + positive pull test all zones + identified trigger 2–4 months prior + normal scalp + no miniaturisation on trichoscopy. No further investigations needed if all criteria met and trigger is obvious.
The FTBVZ blood panel for TE
Test
Target
Why
Ferritin
>70 mcg/L for hair (not just lab range)
Iron deficiency — most common, most treatable contributor
TSH + free T4
TSH 0.4–4.5 mIU/L
Both hypo and hyperthyroid cause TE. Screen all women
B12 + folate
B12 >200 ng/L; folate >7 nmol/L
B12 deficiency (vegans, metformin users) + diet-related TE
Vitamin D (25-OH)
>50 nmol/L
Deficiency associated with hair loss; easily corrected
Zinc
>10 µmol/L
Zinc deficiency — especially crash dieters, vegans
FBC
Hb >120 g/L (F)
Anaemia (but Hb can be normal with low ferritin)
LFTs + urea/creatinine
Normal range
Systemic disease screen if no obvious trigger found
Trichoscopy in TE
Finding
TE pattern
Contrast with AGA
Hair shaft calibre
Uniform — all hairs same thickness
AGA: diversity — thick and miniaturised mixed
Follicular openings
Present — ostia visible, normal
AGA: single-hair units from companion loss
Miniaturisation ratio
<10% — no significant miniaturisation
AGA: >20% in vertex zone
Pull test
Positive in all zones including occiput
AGA: positive frontal/vertex, negative occiput
Yellow/black dots
Absent
AA: yellow + black dots prominent
Perifollicular changes
None
LPP/FFA: peripilar cast, erythema
TE or AGA — the most common diagnostic challenge
TE and FPHL/AGA frequently co-exist, particularly in women over 35. The key question: Is there calibre diversity? Trichoscopy uniform calibre = TE. Calibre diversity = AGA (with or without TE). Many women have both — treat both. Never dismiss "it's just TE" in a woman with diffuse thinning without checking for underlying miniaturisation.
Chronic telogen effluvium
Chronic TE (CTE) is defined as diffuse hair shedding lasting more than 6 months. It is more common in middle-aged women and may fluctuate over years. The prognosis is more variable than acute TE and requires more thorough investigation.
Fig 7.4 — Chronic TE: mechanism, presentation and differential
Fig 7.4: Chronic TE: mechanisms, additional investigations, and the critical comparison with FPHL. These two conditions overlap significantly in middle-aged women and both can be present simultaneously.
When CTE needs urgent investigation
CTE with systemic symptoms (weight loss, fatigue, night sweats, lymphadenopathy) should prompt screen for underlying malignancy, inflammatory disease, or systemic autoimmune condition. Do not attribute all CTE to "stress" or "hormones" without adequate investigation.
Management — the FRONT framework
TE management follows the FRONT framework — a stepwise approach that covers the critical elements without over-medicalising a largely self-limiting condition.
Fig 7.5 — FRONT management framework for telogen effluvium
Fig 7.5: FRONT management framework. The key principles: Find and fix the trigger first, Replace nutritional deficiencies, Optimise nutrition, Normalise the patient's expectations with evidence-based reassurance, and Treat any co-existing conditions (FPHL, CTE).
Evidence-based reassurance — what to tell patients
What is happening
"Your hair follicles are still alive. This is a temporary shedding of resting hairs — the factory workers going home — not destruction of the follicles themselves. New hairs are already beginning to grow before the shedding even stops."
What will happen
"In the vast majority of cases, hair returns fully to its previous thickness within 6–12 months of the trigger being resolved. You will not go bald from telogen effluvium. The shedding you're seeing right now is the end of the process, not the beginning."
Role of minoxidil in TE
Minoxidil is not indicated as first-line treatment for acute TE. The condition is self-limiting and minoxidil does not accelerate telogen resolution. However, if TE has unmasked underlying AGA/FPHL (confirmed by trichoscopy showing miniaturisation), minoxidil is appropriate for the androgenetic component.
Management Pitfall
Do not prescribe minoxidil for acute TE without evidence of co-existing FPHL. If a patient on minoxidil stops it (for any reason), they will experience a minoxidil-cessation TE on top of the original TE — compounding their distress and reinforcing incorrect beliefs about treatment.
Acute shedding + systemic features (fatigue, weight loss)
Full systemic review
Lymphadenopathy? Organomegaly?
Full bloods including LFT, CRP, B12, TFTs, ANA
Exclude systemic disease before attributing to TE
Anki Flashcard Deck — Chapter 7
22 cards covering TE mechanism, triggers, clinical features, diagnosis, chronic TE, and management. Tap to flip.
Card 1 / 22
tap card to flip
Deck complete
All 22 cards
References
APA 7th edition format.
1. Asghar, F., Shamim, N., Farooque, U., Sheikh, H., & Aqeel, R. (2020). Telogen effluvium: A review of the literature. Cureus, 12(5), e8320. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8320
2. Bhoyrul, B., Depasquale, C., & Wall, D. (2020). The management of telogen effluvium: A survey of member practice of the Trichological Society. Dermatologic Therapy, 33(6), e14087. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.14087
3. Callender, V. D., McMichael, A. J., & Cohen, G. F. (2004). Medical and surgical therapies for alopecias in black women. Dermatologic Therapy, 17(2), 164–176.
4. Grover, C., & Khurana, A. (2013). Telogen effluvium. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, 79(5), 591–603. https://doi.org/10.4103/0378-6323.116731
5. Harrison, S., & Sinclair, R. (2002). Telogen effluvium. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 27(5), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2230.2002.01080.x
6. Headington, J. T. (1993). Telogen effluvium: New concepts and review. Archives of Dermatology, 129(3), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1993.01680240096017
7. Kligman, A. M. (1961). Pathologic dynamics of human hair loss: I. Telogen effluvium. Archives of Dermatology, 83(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1961.01580140005002
8. Mubki, T., Rudnicka, L., Olszewska, M., & Shapiro, J. (2014). Evaluation and diagnosis of the hair loss patient: Part II. Trichoscopic and laboratory evaluations. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 71(3), 431.e1–431.e11.
9. Piraccini, B. M., Iorizzo, M., Rech, G., & Tosti, A. (2003). Drug-induced hair disorders. Current Drug Safety, 1(3), 301–305.
10. Ramos, P. M., & Miot, H. A. (2015). Female pattern hair loss: A clinical and pathophysiological review. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 90(4), 529–543.
11. Rebora, A. (2019). Telogen effluvium: An etiopathogenetic study with practical consequences. International Journal of Dermatology, 58(9), 1086–1092. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.14591
12. Shapiro, J. (2007). Hair loss: Principles of diagnosis and management of alopecia. Martin Dunitz.
13. Sinclair, R. D. (2007). Chronic telogen effluvium: A study of 5 patients over 7 years. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 56(2 Suppl), S36–S38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2006.07.028
14. Trüeb, R. M. (2009). Telogen effluvium: Is there a need for a new classification? Skin Appendage Disorders, 1(1), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000366553
15. Whiting, D. A. (1996). Chronic telogen effluvium: Increased scalp hair shedding in middle-aged women. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 35(6), 899–906.
16. Wolff, H., Fischer, T. W., & Blume-Peytavi, U. (2016). The diagnosis and treatment of hair and scalp diseases. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 113(21), 377–386.